Tag: movies v books

claryfray:

Am I the only one bothered by the fact that the Harry Potter movies made James and Lily like 40 years old, they were 21 when they died, it was a specific point JK was making in how young they were when they died and how tragic that was

ivyette:

thetruthinesswillsetyoufree:

but uGH book!harry was so passionate and charismatic and witty and sarcastic and a natural leader and he didn’t fucking need ginny to yell at a group to stfu to get them to listen to him because if harry wanted you to listen he would MAKE YOU FUCKING LISTEN because when he was angry he was intimidating as fuck and he had this intensity about him like he was usually pretty chill and laid back and up for a laugh but you knew if you really pissed him off he might kill you because he had so much inner rage because of his shitty life and sometimes he would explode and he also had an ego like he was humble but also arrogant at times and he could be such a douche but also super nice and like he’ll save your life but he won’t bother being your friend because who the fuck are you to him really and jesus fucking christ HE WAS SO INTERESTING and movie!harry is like blandass oatmeal with no flavor like he was just such a flat character with no charisma NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO HARRY.

I think the worst part is that – like with Rupert and Ron – I think Radcakes would have done a terrific job at playing the real Harry. I think he could have translated these things to the big screen with the right script and direction.